HBO’s “Cash Electrical: The Bitcoin Thriller” documentary has made the daring declare that Canadian Bitcoin developer Peter Todd is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin.
The documentary, produced by Cullen Hobak, presents a number of items of circumstantial proof in its 100-minute runtime to assist this conclusion.
Why HBO believes Todd is Satoshi
Todd, an early participant within the BTC neighborhood, is usually recommended to have used the Satoshi id to reinforce Bitcoin’s credibility.
Based on Hobak, this pseudonym appeared that Bitcoin was created by a longtime cryptographer slightly than “a pupil.” Todd was ending his artwork diploma across the time Bitcoin’s whitepaper was launched in 2008.
Additional, the documentary builds its case round circumstantial proof, together with Todd’s cryptic on-line posts.
One such publish, the place Todd described himself as “the world’s main knowledgeable on easy methods to sacrifice your Bitcoins,” was interpreted as a attainable admission that he destroyed entry to the estimated 1.1 million BTC attributed to Nakamoto.
Additional hypothesis arose from claims that Todd as soon as by accident posted from Satoshi’s account on the BitcoinTalk discussion board in 2010.
Moreover, Todd’s advocacy for the controversial Substitute-by-Charge (RBF) proposal is highlighted. The documentary means that solely somebody with intimate data of Bitcoin’s authentic code—like Nakamoto—might have launched such a technical characteristic.
Polymarket bettors had been principally mistaken.
HBO’s principle brought about appreciable losses on the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket, which had seen customers wager closely on Len Sassaman, a cypherpunk who handed away in 2021, being Satoshi. As of Oct. 5, Sassaman held a 67% chance however noticed his odds slip underneath 10% by Oct. 8.
Within the leadup to the documentary, Nick Szabo, a well known cryptographer, and Adam Again, CEO of Blockstream, emerged as frontrunners. Nevertheless, the market finally concluded that Satoshi’s id was both unknown or a mix of a number of people.
The Polymarket’s pool noticed over $44 million in buying and selling quantity earlier than the movie’s launch.
Group backlash
The documentary has been met with robust criticism from key figures within the crypto house. Todd himself denied Hoback’s declare within the documentary, calling it “ludicrous.” He additionally expressly said on X:
“I’m not Satoshi.”
Pledditor, a well known Bitcoin neighborhood member, criticized the documentary, arguing that every one Nakamoto theories undergo from affirmation bias.
Pledditor defined that theorists typically concentrate on just a few notable figures, retroactively discovering “coincidences” to assist their claims. Based on them, this technique is flawed and ends in stalking and unethical doxxing. He added:
They added:
“The chance that Satoshi was any considered one of these semi-public figures that usually get accused of being Satoshi is fairly slim. That’s why for those who don’t have concrete proof, you need to most likely hold your Satoshi Nakamoto id theories to your self. All it does is put a $60 billion greenback bounty on the again of what’s (more than likely) the mistaken individual.”
Ki Younger Ju, the founding father of CryptoQuant, went so far as to label the documentary “disgusting” for drawing its conclusion regardless of disagreement from Bitcoin consultants. He likened it to selling a flat-earth principle with out scientific evaluation.
BitMEX Analysis additionally dismissed the idea that Todd is Satoshi based mostly on the 2010 BitcoinTalk publish, calling the suggestion “ridiculous.” The agency said that Todd’s publish was merely a sarcastic reply to Satoshi, including:
“There’s zero motive to imagine this was Satoshi.”
In the meantime, Muneeb Ali, the CEO of Belief Machines and co-creator of the Stacks blockchain, said:
“Simply so we’re all clear: peter todd shouldn’t be satoshi. anybody who has significantly labored within the bitcoin business is aware of this.”
Talked about on this article
